Singer, P. (1972). Animal Liberation. Avon Books.
Another argument for animal rights is the argument from marginal cases, which states that if we deny rights to animals, we must also deny rights to humans who are similarly situated, such as those with severe disabilities or cognitive impairments (Kamm, 2003). This argument highlights the arbitrary nature of the distinction between humans and animals, and suggests that rights should be based on individual characteristics, such as sentience and cognitive abilities. zooskool inke animal sex sex with dog bestiality www free
There are several arguments in favor of animal rights. One of the most well-known arguments is the sentience argument, which states that animals have the capacity to feel pain, pleasure, and other emotions, and therefore should be treated with respect and dignity (Singer, 1972). This argument is based on the idea that sentience is a fundamental criterion for moral consideration, and that animals should be treated as individuals with interests and rights. Singer, P
Kamm, F. M. (2003). Morality, Mortality, Volume 1: Death and Whom to Save from It. Oxford University Press. Avon Books
Brambell, F. W. R. (1965). Report of the Technical Committee to Inquire into the Conditions under which Livestock are Kept on Frams. London: HMSO.
Carruthers, P. (2009). The Animal Problem: A Defence of Danto. Oxford University Press.